New Delhi, February 6: The Supreme Court has recently made a significant ruling, clarifying that no court can compel a woman, particularly a minor, to continue a pregnancy against her will. This statement emerged from a case where the court granted permission for a 30-week pregnant girl to undergo an abortion.
According to reports, the girl became pregnant at the age of 17 through a relationship. The Supreme Court noted that at first glance, this pregnancy might appear illegal, as the girl was not of legal age at that time. However, the court emphasized that it is not essential to determine whether the relationship was consensual or involved sexual exploitation.
Crucially, the girl herself does not wish to give birth to the child. The court stated that a woman’s decision should be paramount in matters related to reproduction.
The Supreme Court acknowledged that making a decision in this case was not straightforward. The court raised the question of whose rights should take precedence: those of the unborn child or the woman giving birth. It clarified that a girl cannot be forced to continue her pregnancy without her consent.
During the ruling, the Supreme Court directed Mumbai’s J.J. Hospital to terminate the girl’s pregnancy with all necessary precautions and care.
The court insisted that the hospital must ensure the procedure is conducted safely and that the girl does not suffer any mental or physical harm.
Experts and human rights organizations regard this decision as significant, as it reflects a sensitivity toward reproductive rights. According to the court, respecting a woman’s wishes, especially in the case of minors, is paramount. The court also indicated that in future cases, a woman’s decision should be prioritized, allowing her to make independent choices regarding her life and health.
