Lucknow, February 5: Uttar Pradesh Minister Anil Rajbhar has adopted a strong stance on several issues, including the ban on Chinese manja, the voter list of the Samajwadi Party, and questions regarding the Election Commission.
Rajbhar expressed a very strict position regarding the ban on Chinese manja in Uttar Pradesh. He stated that not only will there be an investigation, but if anyone dies due to manja sold after the ban, the responsible individual will face murder charges and imprisonment.
He emphasized that many lives have already been lost and numerous injuries have occurred due to Chinese manja. Stopping this practice was crucial. The government’s decision is firm, decisive, and in the public interest. Its impact will be felt not only in Uttar Pradesh but across the entire country.
Minister Rajbhar noted that members of the Sikh community are protesting nationwide and demanding an apology. He asserted that no one has the right to insult any individual or community in public and significant places. He advised leaders to reflect on their actions, policies, and conduct. The public has distanced itself from certain leaders, and many have switched parties; this should prompt self-reflection among them.
Regarding the decision to abolish the Madrasa Board in Uttarakhand, the minister clarified that the government’s intention is clear. The government aims for children graduating from madrasas to become doctors, engineers, and officials, contributing to nation-building. This decision is made with the hope that the Minority Board will also engage in meaningful work. He described it as a positive and welcome step.
Targeting the Samajwadi Party, Rajbhar accused them of consistently making false statements. He alleged that the opposition has devised a strategy to attack the Election Commission and put it on trial. The rights granted to the Bharatiya Janata Party by the Election Commission are also available to the Samajwadi Party, other political parties, and the general public.
Rajbhar clarified the situation regarding voter registration, stating that anyone who turns 18 should be included in the voter list. There is a legal process, such as Form-7, for this purpose. If someone believes a name has been wrongly included after the voter list is published, they can file an objection. Those anxious about the investigation of fake voters fear that if fraudulent names are removed, their political interests will be affected, which is why they are in despair and stress.